New Hampshire Foundations of Reading Practice Test

Which strategy is recommended to determine if students should be evaluated for reading or language delays?

1. Using a single test

2. Collecting multiple assessments

3. Asking teachers for opinions only

4. Implementing random evaluations

The correct answer is: Collecting multiple assessments

Collecting multiple assessments is the recommended strategy to determine if students should be evaluated for reading or language delays because it provides a comprehensive picture of a student's abilities and challenges. Relying on a single test can lead to inaccurate conclusions, as one assessment may not capture the full range of a student's skills or may be influenced by external factors such as test anxiety. By gathering data from various sources—such as standardized tests, classroom performance, informal assessments, and observations—educators can better understand a student's strengths and weaknesses. This holistic approach acknowledges the complexities of reading and language development and helps ensure that decisions are well-informed. Collecting multiple assessments allows for a more accurate identification of students who may need additional support or interventions, enhancing the likelihood of effective educational strategies. Other options, like asking only for teacher opinions or implementing random evaluations, do not provide reliable or systematic methods for assessment, which are crucial for identifying potential delays accurately.